Different Beliefs from William Golding and Jean-Jacques...

William Golding and Jean-Jacques Rousseau both have very different beliefs about a man’s naturalistic ability towards others including the society. Rousseau’s view is that a male being is pure, but later ruined by society and its entire entity. Golding’s belief is that a male always has an evil source and/or opening within them and the problem continues to get worse as time evolves. Golding also believes that without a strict series of rules a male being is mentally and naturalistically unstable. Golding displays his belief in his book â€Å"Lord of the Flies† as Rousseau displays his belief in various books of his own liking. Jean Jacques Rousseau was well respected philosopher in the 1700’s who was well respected by many other people. Rousseau’s beliefs are that the male being is corrupted by society itself. In my opinion he is saying that if we didn’t have a strict set of rules and we just let the male being come into our world , th en they would be pure forever. In my opinion, this specific idea frightens me because it seems like he is just trying to make chaos and unstableness. Jean- Jacques Rousseaus had also lived during the enlightenment period. The enlightenment period consisted of new philosophy consisting of sayings, meanings, views, and new economic ideas. Since the period he lived in consisted of a stable good community, perhaps that is why he obtains his philosophy, that the typical male being is truly pure and controlled. William Golding believes that man kindShow MoreRelatedPhilosophy of Rouseau and Lord of the Flies by William Golding666 Words   |  3 Pagesphilosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau believed that people are inherently good. Without civilizations, humans are good beings with empathy, kindness, and well-developed morals. However, he believed that societies corrupt our morals and are what make the change in us to become â€Å"evil† or â€Å"bad†. The author of the novel Lord of the Flies, William Golding, however, believed that in a primitive environment, humans are evil. Without a society watching over us, humans will become barbaric brutes. Jean-Jacques RousseauRead MoreLord Of The Flies Character Analysis Essay1414 Words   |  6 Pages Analysis of Societal Constructs Displayed in LORD â€Å"We hold these truths to be sacred and undeniable; that all men are created equal and independent, that from that equal creation they derive rights inherent and inalienable, among which are the preservation of life, and liberty, and the pursuit of happiness†. This famous phrase that derives from the Declaration of Independence brought forth notion that of all of humanity is to be acknowledged as equal and are guaranteed rights of life which are toRead MoreLord of the Flies: William Golding and Jean Jacques Rousseau708 Words   |  3 PagesWilliam Golding and Jean Jacques Rousseau had very different points of view on society. Golding thought what all humans are born evil and that is what makes society horrible. Rousseau things the complete difference he thinks that all humans are born pure, nice, and innocent and that society is what corrupts humans. I agree with Rousseau because I don’t believe that all humans are born evil. This topic about these different views on society is what the book Lord of the Flies is about. The book writtenRead MoreHuman Nature and Philosophy in Lord of the Flies by William Golding583 Words   |  2 PagesTwo philosophers of different eras tackle the same topic, human nature, and a great argument breaks out. Is man inherently evil, like William Golding believes? Or is man good at heart but inevitably becomes corrupted by the society he lives in, as said by Jean Jacques Rousseau? Both philosophers have very strong opinions and well reasoning for what they believe. Golding’s views are displayed well throughout his novel, Lord of the Flies; a tale about strong minded, young boys stranded on an islandRead MoreDifferent Views from William Golding and Jean-Jacques Rousseau in Lord of the Flies806 Words   |  3 PagesWilliam Golding, author of The Lord of the Flies, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau had very different views on human nature and civilization’s effect of humanity. While Golding believed that human s were inherently evil and that society and its rules were what kept humans in line and good, as reflected in The Lord of the Flies, Rousseau believed the opposite. He believed that humans were inherently good and that it was society and civilizations that corrupted man. For the most part, I agree with Golding’sRead MoreLord of the Flies by William Golding and the Philosophy of Rousseau704 Words   |  3 PagesRousseau and Golding are both philosophers and are both known for different similar topics. Rousseau is known for his first book, A Discourse on the Sciences and Arts, about his philosophies saying that man is good. Golding is known for his bestselling novel he ever wrote, Lord of The Flies, also expressing his philosophies saying that man is evil. Rousseau and Golding have many contrasts that fight against each other’s philosophies but was never spoken to each other because they lived in differentRead MoreHuman Nature - Are Humans Naturally Good or Evil?1481 Wo rds   |  6 Pagescommon power to keep them all in awe, they are in that conditions called war; and such a war, as if of every man, against every man. (Hobbes) Hobbes states that Humans are naturally evil and need a powerful government to control them. Is it true? Rousseau thinks otherwise. In reasoning on the principles he (Thomas Hobbes) lays down, he ought to have said that the state of nature, being that in which the care for our own preservation is the least prejudicial to that of others, was consequently theRead MoreLord Of The Flies By William Golding1789 Words   |  8 PagesWilliam Golding utilizes Lord of the Flies to prove that the inherent nature of man is truly savage and cannot be contained by any form of civil government. Characters, setting, atmosphere, and other elements are all used by Golding in the novel as metaphors and symbols to ultimately reveal the natural intention of man. In Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan, John Locke’s Concerning Civil Governmen t , and Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s The Social Contract, they share their own personal interpretations on man’s inherentRead MoreSouthwest Airlines, Global Positioning System : Humans Is Driven By Competition And The Pressures Of Conflict1800 Words   |  8 Pagesqualities that are often repressed. While the state of nature differs depending on belief, Hobbes believes that in the state of nature humans are aggressive, evil, and will return to primitive behavior. This selfish behavior of humans can be seen through our tendency to look out for ourselves, while our competitiveness can be seen through our desire to constantly be the best. Society has helped humans evolve from hunter-gatherers to functional citizens, yet as soon as society fades, we resort to